🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.