🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.