🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document offers a flawed assessment of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an grave risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The actual danger confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Economic Gap Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the European Union. Over this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from 76.5% to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like France and Italy.

Today, about 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Innovation Deficit: A Critical Problem

The growing disparity is driven by stronger productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at over $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap prompts a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is the EU stand? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of key factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and agile system for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can introduce a product under a single regulatory framework to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has eroded its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these hurdles, one can find causes for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for major changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, these assets could support much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant strengths: skilled workforce, excellent schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically boost economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical moment. As the saying goes, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.